Not Saussure

April 26, 2007

Wikipedia, bloggers and accuracy

Filed under: Blogroll, Internet — notsaussure @ 6:55 pm

Tim Worstall discusses the views of Oliver Kamm and Stephen Pollard on Wikipedia. Oliver Kamm complains that

By design, the most popular reference source on the Web operates by consensus rather than by discriminating between fact and error.

This leads to errors; he writes,

Here is a small example concerning my family, and that I cite because I therefore know the subject and it illustrates what I’m talking about. It would be difficult to name an African country that has suffered war in the last 40 years and whose travails have not been reported by Martin Bell for the BBC. One of those countries, however, is Rwanda. Wikipedia’s entry for Martin, sure enough, cites prominently his journalism from that country – a body of work that no one has seen because it doesn’t exist. It’s the type of small error – something that might have happened, but didn’t – that no amateur editor would feel sufficiently strongly about to check, or sure about to delete. Inevitably, given Wikipedia’s reach and unwarranted use even by serious newspapers, that factoid will make its way into profiles and, one day, obituaries of the man. It’s not important; it doesn’t affect his professional reputation one way or the other; it’s just wrong. By not discriminating between fact and error, the Web and specifically Wikipedia increasingly blur the distinction between them.

Stephen Pollard agrees, drawing attention to inaccuracies in the entry on him,

The entry on me, for instance – probably the only subject about which I can claim to the the world’s leading expert – has so many basic errors of fact that it is laughable.

He then goes on to discuss some of them; his biography of David Blunkett wasn’t official, he’s never appeared on Question Time and so forth. He writes,

I have made a point of never correcting it because once I start, there will be no end to it, as it is forever altered with new errors.

However, someone’s corrected it, and within hours of Mr Pollard’s criticisms appearing. I thought of correcting the Martin Bell entry, but, instead, left a comment in the Discussion section, drawing attention to Kamm’s complaint. In under an hour, someone replied,

His profile on the BBC lists Rwanda as a country he has reported from, whether the BBC profile is correct or not is another matter…

And so it does, telling us that

Martin Bell joined the BBC in Norwich aged 24 with a first-class honours degree from King’s College, Cambridge, behind him.The call to London came three years later, and soon he was in Ghana on his first foreign assignment.

Over the next 30 years, he reported from 80 countries and covered 11 conflicts. He made his name in Vietnam in the 1960s, and also covered wars in the Middle East, Nigeria, Angola and Rwanda, as well as numerous assignments in Northern Ireland.

One rather assumes that whoever wrote the Wikipedia entry took the information from the BBC rather thna the other way round and, if the international broadcasting organisation for which he supposed reported from Rwanda can’t get it right, it’s a bit hard to blame Wikipedia for reproducing the error.

From the point of view of correcting errors, Wikipedia seems to work better than the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, which was very heavily criticised for its inaccuracies when it came out in 2004 (and, of course, Wikipedia doesn’t cost £7,500 for a copy). To be fair, the ODNB were aware of that inaccuracies are inevitable; as the Preface puts it,

Nobody who has been involved with the new dictionary believes it to be free from errors and gaps, and we who have created it accept responsibility for its defects. ‘That there are errors in the Dictionary,’ wrote [Sir Sidney ]Lee [of the first edition] ‘those who have been most closely associated with its production are probably more conscious than other people.’ [Colin] Matthew felt that the creators of what became the Oxford DNB should not seek perfection, for that would hinder completion: only through publication could the project’s labours benefit readers. The Oxford DNB’s defects will gradually be corrected after September 2004 in response to changes in evidence, interpretation, and priorities. No longer does a century need to elapse before such improvements can be made. After 2004 it will, for the first time in its history, be continually refined and amplified in its online edition and printed supplements, and will gain further strength from the collaboration with readers and contributors which has moulded the Dictionary since its inception in 1882.

Inaccuracies, it seems to me, are unavoidable in such an enterprise; a friend of mine was commissioned to write some of the ODNB articles and found herself under very considerable time pressure from the deadlines — obviously, compiling articles for the ODNB isn’t her main job and, while she knows a great deal about C19th Imperial British history, she did have to research some of the more obscure figures on whom she was writing, which takes time. She’s not completely happy with some of what she wrote — she thinks it’s correct, but couldn’t swear to it because she had in some respects to rely on secondary sources that she doesn’t wholly trust rather than dig out the original archive documents; but, when she raised this objection to the editors who were pressing her on deadlines they, not unreasonably, said they couldn’t give everyone extensions or the new edition would never get published.

I’m with Tim on this; one doesn’t expect encyclopaedias to be accurate — errors are, unfortunately, inevitable. Wikipedia has a better chance than most of being accurate, or at least having its more egregious errors corrected swiftly (as with Mr Pollard’s entry) than does the ODNB — had my friend been writing her articles for Wikipedia she could have submitted, and revised, them at her leisure rather than having to wait for her revisions to go through the ODNB’s committee procedures for her (or others’) corrections and emendations to appear in the online edition and in print supplements.

On a lighter note, Dave Cross has an illuminating article on Petronella Wyatt’s Wikipedia entry. Seems she created her own entry (very poor form) and then, a few days later, wrote an entertaining piece in the Daily Mail about how it was vandalised. Except, as Mr Cross notes,

It seems likely that Ms. Wyatt genuinely didn’t realise that Wikipedia articles have a history, so she didn’t know that her claims could be checked out quite so easily. But given that she has so obviously used “journalistic licence” exaggerate this event, how much can you trust anything else that she writes?

It’s one thing to complain that entries in Wikipedia are inaccurate — but knowingly making inaccurate claims about their inaccuracy… this could get ever so recursive.

Declaration of interest: there’s a bit about Ms Wyatt and her Wikipedia entry over at Mr Worstall’s place. I’m the person who made the perfectly accurate and sourced emendation, based on Tim’s comments, that was removed (on the grounds it was more relevant to The Spectator than to Ms Wyatt) within five minutes.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Advertisements

6 Comments »

  1. I’m not sure about this. The Wiki entry on Pollard still doesn’t go into enough detail about what a worthless tool he is.

    More seriously, in those areas of mathematics about which I know anything, I’m constantly impressed at the the depth and accuracy of the Wikipedia articles.

    As long as one remembers that it’s fallible, it’s a very useful tool.

    Comment by Larry Teabag — April 26, 2007 @ 7:25 pm

  2. Very interesting post NS. My experience of Wiki on mostly scientific subjects is similar to the previous poster’s.

    I think people tend to overestimate the accuracy of traditional media. I know that whenever I read an article in the Guardian on a subject I am knowledgeable about, it is typically wrong in at least some of the details.

    Comment by thesamovar — April 26, 2007 @ 10:05 pm

  3. Possibly I’m in a minority on Wiki but on the non-controversial subjects, e.g. Henry VIII, it is quite a good tool and the pics are immensely useful.

    I understand that it is not blog-fashionable to praise Wiki.

    Comment by jameshigham — April 27, 2007 @ 7:54 pm

  4. Not to blow my own horn, but Zoe Williams, the abysmal Grauniad hack was up to even more egregious acts on Wikipedia not so long back: http://www.septicisle.info/2007/03/zoe-williams-watch-those-wikipedia.html

    Comment by . — April 27, 2007 @ 8:40 pm

  5. I came versa before he finished and dispersed up my trigger jessica simpson dolly parton wardrobe with his nightstand juice. I laughed as I got on my spankings and gave him a early ppussy job.

    Comment by maksSomY — February 20, 2008 @ 5:30 am

  6. Learn How to take Advantage of America’s Financial Crisis from Bill Bartmann’s new Book, “Bailout Riches”
    “With the economy in crisis, Bill Bartmann finds the diamond in the rough,” said David Lindahl, author of Emerging Real Estate Markets and Multi-Family Millions

    What is the investment opportunity from America’s financial crisis? According to Bill Bartmann, it is somewhere in the north of one trillion dollars of debt – mortgages, credit cards and other forms will be sold to buyers for pennies on the dollar. “It gets even better,” said Bill Bartmann. “There are ways to buy that debt without using your own money!”

    Investors with the right roadmap are poised to profit spectacularly as Bill Bartmann lays out a step by step plan on how to find the best deals form the federal government, local financial institutions and loan brokers. “The spectrum of loans that are available include credit card debt, consumer loans, business loans, commercial loans and real estate loans,” said Bartmann.

    Bill Bartmann’s book, Bailout Riches, is about how to invest in the bailout itself and take your own cut of the trillion-dollar pie. Bill Bartmann made a fortune the last time the government bailed out the savings and loan industry. “This time around, the bailout is much bigger and the opportunities for profit are much greater,” said Bartmann.

    “Who better to teach you how to prosper from this economic chaos than a man who actually took himself from ‘bankruptcy to billionaire’ during the last crisis,” said Ken Blanchard, co-author of The One Minute Entrepreneur.

    “Bill Bartmann is more than a great financial success story; he is a phenomenal teacher who has helped thousands of my students achieve success. Bailout Riches will show you how you can prosper during these tumultuous times,” said Harv Eker, author, New York Times #1 bestseller, Secrets of the Millionaire Mind.

    Bill Bartmann’s book, Bailout Riches, is available for purchase at http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Bailout-Riches/Bill-Bartmann/e/9780470478257

    buy herbal Bill Bartmann
    buy Bill Bartmann without doctor
    buy Bill Bartmann with mastercard
    Bill Bartmann no prescription
    buy discount Bill Bartmann
    purchase Bill Bartmann online
    buy cheapest Bill Bartmann
    buy Bill Bartmann c o d
    buy Bill Bartmann without rx
    buy Bill Bartmann free consultation
    online pharmacy Bill Bartmann
    where can i buy Bill Bartmann
    buy Bill Bartmann drugs
    where can i buy Bill Bartmann online without a prescription
    buy cheap Bill Bartmann under without rx
    generic Bill Bartmann online
    buy Bill Bartmann without prescription
    buy cheap generic Bill Bartmann
    Bill Bartmann buy Bill Bartmann
    canada Bill Bartmann
    Bill Bartmann uk sales
    medikament Bill Bartmann
    online pharmacies Bill Bartmann
    Bill Bartmann for sale
    uk Bill Bartmann
    Bill Bartmann buy online in stock
    buy Bill Bartmann cheap without prescription
    buy Bill Bartmann pills
    where to buy Bill Bartmann by cod
    Bill Bartmann cheap
    cheap Bill Bartmann uk
    buy Bill Bartmann online cheap
    buy Bill Bartmann diet pills
    wholesale Bill Bartmann cheap
    buying Bill Bartmann online
    Bill Bartmann overdose
    Bill Bartmann uk
    Bill Bartmann without a prescription
    best buy Bill Bartmann
    buy Bill Bartmann no rx
    Bill Bartmann effects
    purchase generic Bill Bartmann online
    online Bill Bartmann purchase
    buy Bill Bartmann cod
    where to buy Bill Bartmann without a prescription
    uk Bill Bartmann cheap
    Bill Bartmann no prescription to buy
    Bill Bartmann overnight
    order cheap Bill Bartmann online
    purchase Bill Bartmann
    prezzo Bill Bartmann
    Bill Bartmann prix
    buy Bill Bartmann fed ex
    want to buy Bill Bartmann in malaysia
    purchase cheap Bill Bartmann
    Bill Bartmann cash on delivery
    buy cheap Bill Bartmann no prescription
    Bill Bartmann purchase online
    Bill Bartmann without prescription
    buy Bill Bartmann epharmacist
    buy Bill Bartmann in the uk
    Bill Bartmann buy
    Bill Bartmann without rx
    Bill Bartmann online
    Bill Bartmann prescription
    el Bill Bartmann generico
    buy Bill Bartmann online with a debit card
    Bill Bartmann buy online
    buy pharmacy Bill Bartmann waterview
    buy cheap Bill Bartmann without prescription
    buy Bill Bartmann online no prescription
    buy Bill Bartmann in mo
    buy Bill Bartmann online us pharmacy
    Bill Bartmann apotheke
    order Bill Bartmann online
    order generic Bill Bartmann online
    buy cod Bill Bartmann
    Bill Bartmann to buy
    Bill Bartmann online order
    buy mail order Bill Bartmann
    uk order Bill Bartmann
    buy Bill Bartmann uk
    cheap Bill Bartmann usa
    buy next day Bill Bartmann
    order Bill Bartmann usa
    cheapest place to buy Bill Bartmann
    buy Bill Bartmann shipped cod
    buying Bill Bartmann
    prescription Bill Bartmann
    Bill Bartmann bestellen
    Bill Bartmann drug
    buy Bill Bartmann online no rx
    online prescription Bill Bartmann
    Bill Bartmann toronto
    Bill Bartmann canada
    discount Bill Bartmann
    Bill Bartmann usa
    buy Bill Bartmann where
    Bill Bartmann online purchase
    Bill Bartmann tablets
    Bill Bartmann order online
    buy Bill Bartmann with no prescription
    buy Bill Bartmann diet pill
    online Bill Bartmann
    uk buy Bill Bartmann
    Bill Bartmann price
    generic Bill Bartmann uk
    where buy Bill Bartmann
    buy Bill Bartmann cash on delivery
    no prescription Bill Bartmann
    Bill Bartmann preis
    generic Bill Bartmann usa
    purchase cheap Bill Bartmann online
    Bill Bartmann prices
    order buy Bill Bartmann online
    buy generic Bill Bartmann online
    Bill Bartmann rezept
    Bill Bartmann pharmacy
    order Bill Bartmann uk
    how to buy Bill Bartmann without a prescription
    buy Bill Bartmann online without prescription
    buy Bill Bartmann usa
    where to buy Bill Bartmann online
    Bill Bartmann purchase
    buy cheap Bill Bartmann online free consult
    Bill Bartmann buy on line
    Bill Bartmann order
    Bill Bartmann sale
    buy Bill Bartmann no prescription low cost
    online Bill Bartmann order
    Bill Bartmann best buy
    online Bill Bartmann buy
    Bill Bartmann mexico
    buy in Bill Bartmann uk
    Bill Bartmann espana
    buy cheap Bill Bartmann with dr. prescription
    Bill Bartmann on line
    no rx Bill Bartmann
    order generic Bill Bartmann
    Bill Bartmann buy cod
    cheap Bill Bartmann online
    Bill Bartmann from india
    what does Bill Bartmann look like
    buy Bill Bartmann pay cod
    buy Bill Bartmann without a credit card
    cheap generic Bill Bartmann
    Bill Bartmann tabletten
    buy cheap generic Bill Bartmann online
    buy Bill Bartmann without a perscription
    what is Bill Bartmann
    buy Bill Bartmann in england
    pharmacy Bill Bartmann
    Bill Bartmann generic
    buy Bill Bartmann no prescriptions
    Bill Bartmann oral
    buy Bill Bartmann doctor prescription
    where can i buy Bill Bartmann without prescription
    buy Bill Bartmann without a rx
    buy cheap Bill Bartmann free fedex
    where to buy Bill Bartmann
    uk Bill Bartmann generic
    Bill Bartmann cheap mexican
    where can i buy herbal Bill Bartmann
    Bill Bartmann suppliers
    buy Bill Bartmann canada

    Comment by Bill Bartmann FlarmaImmaphy — August 29, 2009 @ 3:18 am


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: