On the face of it, this looks like good news:
John Reid, the Home Secretary, has said he has so far seen no evidence which supports increasing the time police can detain terror suspects beyond 28 days.
He confirmed that his long-awaited review of counter-terrorism has now been completed and handed to the Prime Minister and said that proposals on new terrorism measures could be expected in the New Year.
However, I don’t trust the man and I rather suspect some new horror lies behind this apparently encouraging statement. For one thing, the report goes on to say that
he would consider extending beyond 28 days if he was provided with a “factually-based case” and measures which would reassure Parliament that it would not be used “arbitrarily”.
This I — perhaps unfairly, but I fear not, given this government’s track record — gloss as
We don’t to risk another Commons defeat on the matter, but as soon as I think I can get it through Parliament…
It’s interesting, incidentally, that this seems to suggest either Tony knows something Reid doesn’t or that Reid thinks Tony’s deluding himself; only a month ago, the BBC reported:
Tony Blair has said he still backs plans to hold terror suspects for up to 90 days without charge.
He said he believed the evidence backed longer detention and that he had not changed his mind since losing a Commons vote on the issue last year.
Meanwhile in another development at the Home Office, The Times reports,
Poor record-keeping at the Home Office means no one knows how many people are employed by the department, according to a government watchdog report published yesterday.
The department has also run up an “overdraft” of £246 million with the Office of the Paymaster General and is still struggling to get a grip on its finances.
It is unable to reconcile the amounts of money owing to suppliers with the records of suppliers themselves and there are weaknesses in matching purchasing orders with invoices. For the second year running Sir John Bourn, the Comptroller and Auditor-General, is critical of financial management at the Home Office.
He has given only qualified approval to the annual accounts of the department after last year failing to approve them at all because of the flawed financial records
This is getting as bad as the EU; only last month Ed Balls, the Economic Secretary to the Treasury, was telling the Institute of Chartered Accountants that
“Europe must do better to end this annual embarrassment [of the European Court of Auditors’ refusing to sign off the EU accounts].
“By giving national parliaments greater opportunity to scrutinise how EU funds are managed, I believe we can help give taxpayers the reassurances they rightly expect.
“In taking a lead on this issue and providing a model of effective budgetary supervision, the UK can help Europe make great strides to improve the quality and accuracy of the EU accounts.
“All member states must accept their responsibilities to work together to achieve the clean bill of health for the EU’s accounts that taxpayers deserve.”
The Times does add that
Sir John said yesterday that the department had worked hard to address many of the problems.
This I take to be a reference to the fact they’ve tidied up the accounts considerably since the debacle the previous year, of which the Public Accounts Committee produced a scathing account that was rather overshadowed by their criticisms, in the same report, of the lost foreign prisoners; of that, the website of Richard Bacon MP, a member of the Committee, says
When Parliament’s financial watchdog, the National Audit Office, looked at data produced by the Home Office’s new finance system, Adelphi, it found the gross value of debits and credits amounted to some £26,527,108,436,994 (i.e. £26.5 trillion), almost 2,000 times higher than the Home Office’s spending for 2004-05 and approximately one and a half times higher than the estimated GDP of the entire planet.
We’d heard back in June that the Home Office had illegal immigrants working for them, and more recently that they discovered they’d got a senior member of Hizb ut-Tahir, a group they proposed to ban but haven’t yet so done, working in a sensitive deparment of the Immigration Service. And now it transpires they don’t know how many people they’ve got working for them at all.
In these, in the God, are the people who want to
give us charge us for directly and spend vast amounts of our taxes on setting up and administering sodding ID cards! For pity’s sake, if they can’t even manage efficiently to issue ID cards to their own staff — clearly they can’t have done, or they could just have counted the number of staff ID cards they’ve issued and not cancelled when people leave — then how on earth do they expect to make the damn things work for the whole country?
For more on ID cards and the Home Office’s problems with sums, see NO2ID
Farhat Khan will get the red carpet treatment today from Tony and Cherie Blair in recognition of her tireless community work – just 48 hours before she makes a last plea against deportation.
The 54-year-old Pakistani grandmother, who has already been honoured at a Buckingham Palace reception, has become a respected and popular figure in Manchester. She claimed asylum in Britain six years ago after fleeing a violent husband whose relatives had already made plans to marry off two of their youngest daughters to older men as soon as they reached puberty.
Well, at least they’ll know where she is. Nice to see people integrating, is it not?
tag: Home Office, John Reid, Identity Cards, Home Office Accounts